Thursday, November 24, 2005

Treacherous Writing

At the outset let me state that I have never studied literature, writing devices, or narrative technique. What follows are entirely naïve, completely personal opinions.

I have always been troubled by what I call ‘being clever’ with words. I could take examples of this phenomenon from popular writing here in the blogosphere, but would rather not. For obvious reasons. Like being shot. So I fall back on the example I have always used to explain this. An ex-colleague used to have the following IDs on yahoo messenger - ‘Queen of Disorient’ and ‘Acid Ditty’. Most people, including in all probability you, fair reader, would find these handles funny and creative, even somewhat cerebral. But they just make me feel nauseous and irritated. Of late, after coming into contact with a certain blogger whose writing I otherwise respect, but who often makes use of this ‘clever’ device, I decide to be more open-minded and made an honest attempt to appreciate this sort of writing. I now find ‘Queen of Disorient’ interesting but still can’t handle ‘Acid Ditty’. And I find that truly inspired writing, like that of Marquez or Shakespeare, never resort to such verbal jugglery, or to put it honestly, cheap tricks.

Another device that I do not particularly like is ‘the surprise twist’, the one where you find out right at the end that the protagonist is a cripple (and has been one all along). It makes me go ‘hmm, right’ but does not move me at all. Recently I was discussing a class script exercise that I was facing a block with with a friend. He suggested a twist which at that moment seemed like a good idea to me, more because it would make out my protagonist to be strong rather than for the surprise element, but later I did not include it because it seemed forced. Twists of that nature seldom occur in real life, and somehow to me it seems like ‘cheating’ the audience/reader. The only ‘twist’ story I’ve ever liked is the one by O’Henry where the woman cuts and sells her hair to buy her paramour a chain for his watch, and he sells the watch to buy her a comb for her hair – but this is purely because it appeals to the romantic female in me. There are of course genres when withholding information from the audience/reader is essential – in a detective story or in a comedy about mixed identity. But otherwise, really, it is just another cheap trick to mask average writing.

Waiting for the brick bats - be sure to make them clever ;)

5 Comments:

At November 25, 2005 10:17 AM , Blogger Citizen Earth said...

aweesome... i was just thinking about this this morning.

its art and it will always have an audience the "cheap tricks" gets one junta appeal... and some how is easy to write also!! the build up is always a easy thing to write...

as for why i was thinking about art always having an audience...
its a post i am working on...

 
At November 25, 2005 11:40 AM , Blogger First Rain said...

A not-so-fair reader says: Every ensemble of words, whether in prose or in poetry, tells a story in some form. The degree of `how well' it tells the story is the author's constant nightmare and the reader's constant expectation. Of course there are words which just lie around here and there; and don't really say anything (like these :D). But building any bridge is worth the effort, as long as it gets the point across!

Did I say anything clever in all this?

 
At November 25, 2005 1:05 PM , Blogger heretic said...

Sounds like David Dhawan vs Satyajit Ray.

The baseline is audience. However, to each his own (devices, I mean *grin).

Mea culpa for the cripple story, but am surprised you didn't see Hope in the eyes of the protagonist. Then again, given our analogy, I'd probably be a Kiran Kumar. :-))

 
At November 25, 2005 1:06 PM , Blogger heretic said...

Before one forgets, thanks for the feedback. :-)

 
At November 25, 2005 11:22 PM , Blogger cactusjump said...

TP: For those we love any handle is forgiven :) Guilty of the breaking up lines to form a poem thing - too clever to make them rhyme though - lol! Definitely not guilty of making my writing obscure however - that's just something that seems to happen when I feel a need to write but don't want to reveal too much. Anyway, I'm not a writer, never claimed to be one, and this blog does not feature creative writing in anyway - more of a brain dump really. Hey - is there an email add that one cud track u down with?

earth: blog posts are art?

fr: ur too sweet to be clever :)

heretic: oh right, hope in the eyes of the protagonist - that makes it all fall into place. sarcasm intended. enough cupcakes givin u bouquets, hence a thorn from the xerophyte.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home